Synthesise information, analyse data, and make better decisions

Conduct a competitive analysis for [YOUR PRODUCT / COMPANY] in the [MARKET / INDUSTRY]. My product: [1-2 sentence description + target customer] Competitors to analyse: [LIST 3-5 COMPETITORS or "identify the main ones"] For each competitor, analyse: 1. **Product** — what they offer, key features, positioning 2. **Pricing** — model and price points 3. **Target customer** — who they're actually selling to 4. **Marketing** — how they acquire customers, key messages 5. **Strengths** — what they genuinely do well 6. **Weaknesses** — where they fall short (validated, not wishful thinking) Output: - Comparison table (all competitors vs dimensions) - Where the market gap is (what none of them do well) - My product's best positioning angle given this landscape - 3 features I should prioritise based on competitor gaps

Analyse these survey results and give me actionable insights. Survey data: [PASTE YOUR SURVEY RESULTS — numbers, percentages, or raw responses] Survey context: - What we were trying to learn: [SURVEY GOAL] - Who we surveyed: [RESPONDENT DESCRIPTION] - Sample size: [NUMBER] - When it was conducted: [DATE/PERIOD] Analyse for: 1. **Key findings** — the 5 most significant insights (not just the obvious ones) 2. **Surprising results** — what you didn't expect 3. **Patterns** — what clusters or correlations appear 4. **Contradictions** — where answers conflict 5. **What's missing** — questions you should have asked 6. **Recommended actions** — specific decisions this data supports Output: executive summary + detailed findings + recommendations table

Write a literature review on [TOPIC] for [PURPOSE: dissertation / report / systematic review]. Sources to synthesise: [LIST YOUR SOURCES or paste abstracts] Topic/research question: [WHAT IS THE REVIEW TRYING TO ESTABLISH] Field: [ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE] Scope: [TIME PERIOD, GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE, TYPE OF STUDIES] Word count: [TARGET LENGTH] Structure: 1. Introduction (context, scope, structure of the review) 2. Thematic sections (organise by theme, NOT by source) 3. Critical synthesis (where sources agree, disagree, or have gaps) 4. Identification of gaps (what is not yet known) 5. Conclusion (summary of state of knowledge) Style: [APA / MLA / Harvard] — cite in-text properly

Conduct a thorough SWOT analysis for [COMPANY / PRODUCT / PROJECT / DECISION]. Context: [DESCRIBE WHAT YOU'RE ANALYSING] Current situation: [BRIEF BACKGROUND] Decision or goal this supports: [WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS SWOT] For each quadrant, I need MORE than surface-level points: - Strengths: internal advantages (be specific — what capabilities, assets, advantages) - Weaknesses: internal limitations (honest — what slows you down or makes you vulnerable) - Opportunities: external conditions to exploit (market trends, competitor gaps, timing) - Threats: external risks to plan for (be specific — not "competition exists") Output: 1. Full SWOT (5 points per quadrant, in priority order) 2. TOWS matrix (how Strengths address Threats, Weaknesses block Opportunities) 3. Top 3 strategic priorities that emerge from this analysis 4. One red flag I should not ignore

Design a research framework for investigating: [RESEARCH QUESTION] Research context: - Purpose: [academic / business / product / policy] - Resources available: [time, budget, team] - What decisions this research will inform: [DESCRIBE] - Existing knowledge: [WHAT YOU ALREADY KNOW] Framework should cover: 1. **Research design** — qualitative / quantitative / mixed and why 2. **Sampling strategy** — who to study and how to select them 3. **Data collection methods** — with pros/cons for each 4. **Analysis approach** — how you'll make sense of the data 5. **Validity and reliability** — how to ensure trustworthy results 6. **Ethical considerations** — consent, data protection, bias 7. **Timeline and milestones** 8. **How to present findings** for your audience

Help me make this decision using a structured framework. The decision: [DESCRIBE THE DECISION YOU NEED TO MAKE] Options I'm considering: [LIST 2-5 OPTIONS] Constraints: [TIME / BUDGET / PEOPLE / TECHNICAL LIMITATIONS] What matters most to me: [YOUR PRIORITIES] What I'm afraid of: [WORST CASE SCENARIOS] Apply the best framework for this type of decision: - [Weighted criteria matrix / PRO-CON / Regret minimisation / Second-order thinking / Pre-mortem] For each option: - Score against criteria - Best case / likely case / worst case - Reversibility (can I undo this if wrong?) - What information would change my mind Recommendation: which option the framework suggests + your honest assessment of whether it's right.

Help me analyse and solve this business problem. Problem statement: [DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM] Current symptoms: [WHAT YOU'RE OBSERVING] When it started: [WHEN DID THIS BECOME A PROBLEM] What we've already tried: [PREVIOUS ATTEMPTS AND WHY THEY FAILED] Stakeholders affected: [WHO IS IMPACTED] Resources available to fix it: [BUDGET, TEAM, TIME] Analysis frameworks to apply: 1. **5 Whys** — dig to the actual root cause 2. **Fishbone diagram** — categorise causes (people, process, technology, environment) 3. **Impact/effort matrix** — prioritise solutions Output: - Root cause (not just symptoms) - 5 solution options (with realistic assessment of each) - Recommended solution + implementation steps - How to measure if we've solved it

Help me fact-check and verify these claims. Claims to verify: [LIST THE CLAIMS OR PASTE THE TEXT] For each claim: 1. **Classification** — verifiable fact / opinion / prediction / misleading framing 2. **What I'd need to verify it** — specific sources, data, or evidence required 3. **Red flags** — signs of potential misinformation (vague statistics, missing context, emotional manipulation) 4. **Questions to ask** — what the claim doesn't mention that I should investigate Also: - Identify the strongest claim (hardest to dispute) - Identify the weakest claim (most likely to be wrong) - Suggest 3 reliable source types to verify this topic Note: Be honest about what you cannot verify and why.